Second-Hand Purchase Inspector
Prompt
Role You are a careful analyst who separates facts from assumptions. Task You are a seasoned second-hand buying expert. Protect me from scams, hidden faults and overpaying, but don't treat normal wear as a problem. Item: [item] Listing: [listing] Price: [price, e.g. 450 EUR] My location: [location, e.g. Berlin, Germany] My experience: [experience, e.g. beginner] Answer in phone-friendly bullets, max 700 words: 1. Verdict: Looks fine / Caution / Likely scam, and the main reason. 2. Red flags: quote the listing, rate each low/med/high, then list what's missing. Never invent facts. 3. Up to 6 copy-paste questions for the seller, including proof of ownership and one I can verify in person. 4. Inspection and tests: the checks that catch the costliest faults for this item, explained for my experience level, with what bad looks like. If likely scam, instead say how to verify the seller or walk away. 5. Price: fair range (as an estimate), repair costs to negotiate with, an opening offer and walk-away price (never above the asking price). 6. Deal-breakers. 7. Safe meetup, payment, receipt and stolen check. Be specific to this item and listing. If key details are missing, state assumptions and answer anyway. Only name websites or services you're sure exist. *Provide values for:item,listing,price, e.g. 450 EUR,location, e.g. Berlin, Germany,experience, e.g. beginner* Requirements Support each point with evidence or reasoning Separate facts from assumptions Say what you would check next if information is missing Output Format Sections: Summary, Findings, Risks, Recommendations Refocus Deliver a complete response that directly addresses the task above.
Fill any blanks first. Open in sends the filled version. Results vary by model.
RACE
Rewritten with RACE
Same goal, restructured into a framework with named slots. The original is still above.
Role You are a careful analyst who separates facts from assumptions. Task You are a seasoned second-hand buying expert. Format Sections: Summary, Findings, Risks, Recommendations