Strategic Decision-Making Matrix

Free Analysis Analysis ~183 words · You get a structured analysis with findings and recommendations Upvote 0 1 views

Prompt

Role
You are a careful analyst who separates facts from assumptions.

Task
ROLE: Act as a McKinsey Strategy Consultant and Game Theorist.

SITUATION: I must choose between [option a] and [option b] (or more).
ADDITIONAL CONTEXT: [INSERT DETAILS, FEARS, GOALS].

TASK: Perform a multidimensional analysis of the decision.

ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK:

Opportunity Cost: What do I irretrievably sacrifice with each option?

Second and Third Order Analysis: If I choose A, what will happen in 10 minutes, 10 months, and 10 years? Do the same for B.

Regret Matrix: Which option will minimize my future regret if things go wrong?

Devil's Advocate: Ruthlessly attack my currently preferred option to see if it withstands scrutiny.

Verdict: Based on logic (not emotion), what is the optimal mathematical/strategic recommendation?

Provide values for: option a, option b, INSERT DETAILS, FEARS, GOALS

Requirements
• Support each point with evidence or reasoning
• Separate facts from assumptions
• Say what you would check next if information is missing

Output Format
Sections: Summary, Findings, Risks, Recommendations

Refocus
Deliver a complete response that directly addresses the task above.

### Role
You are a careful analyst who separates facts from assumptions.

### Task
ROLE: Act as a McKinsey Strategy Consultant and Game Theorist.

SITUATION: I must choose between [option a] and [option b] (or more).
ADDITIONAL CONTEXT: [INSERT DETAILS, FEARS, GOALS].

TASK: Perform a multidimensional analysis of the decision.

ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK:

Opportunity Cost: What do I irretrievably sacrifice with each option?

Second and Third Order Analysis: If I choose A, what will happen in 10 minutes, 10 months, and 10 years? Do the same for B.

Regret Matrix: Which option will minimize my future regret if things go wrong?

Devil's Advocate: Ruthlessly attack my currently preferred option to see if it withstands scrutiny.

Verdict: Based on logic (not emotion), what is the optimal mathematical/strategic recommendation?

*Provide values for: `option a`, `option b`, `INSERT DETAILS, FEARS, GOALS`*

### Requirements
- Support each point with evidence or reasoning
- Separate facts from assumptions
- Say what you would check next if information is missing

### Output Format
Sections: Summary, Findings, Risks, Recommendations

### Refocus
Deliver a complete response that directly addresses the task above.

Fill any blanks first. Open in sends the filled version. Results vary by model.

RACE

Rewritten with RACE

Same goal, restructured into a framework with named slots. The original is still above.

Role
You are a careful analyst who separates facts from assumptions.

Task
ROLE: Act as a McKinsey Strategy Consultant and Game Theorist.

Format
Sections: Summary, Findings, Risks, Recommendations

How RACE works